Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 83

-3

@austinc3301 1. See my substack on all this and see if you can poke holes in what I said. I doubt you can; and you give no argument.
2. See below. You are lost, and the vendetta against me is evidence of how lost you are.

12/23/2024, 2:05:51 AM

In reply to:

Agus 🔎 🔸

@austinc3301

393d

I can’t believe Gary Marcus is doubling down on the training set stuff. Will he ever admit he’s wrong on anything?

The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing a debate on the credibility and correctness of Gary Marcus's views on training sets, which is a public issue related to AI and machine learning. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational, challenging the other party to refute the author's arguments while dismissing their criticism as a vendetta.

Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the other party's criticism as a vendetta and does not address the substance of their argument, which constitutes a personal attack. [-2]
Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement does not acknowledge any possibility of error or openness to correction, instead expressing doubt that the other party can find flaws in their argument. [-1]