Gary Marcus

The statement by @austinc3301 addresses a public issue related to the presentation and interpretation of AI training sets, which is a topic of public interest and debate. The tone suggests a defense against criticism and an attempt to align with others who share similar concerns.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but is defensive in nature, which could escalate tensions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does imply criticism of another's professional stance.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead focuses on defending a position without engaging in dialogue. [-1]