Tamay Besiroglu
@tamaybes
·
392d
The statement critiques the current discourse on AI performance evaluation, emphasizing the lack of scientific rigor and the premature conclusions being drawn. It highlights the need for proper scientific methods, such as control groups, in evaluating AI systems.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating for scientific rigor, which is crucial for accurate understanding and decision-making. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by pointing out the need for proper scientific evaluation, encouraging a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the flaws in current evaluation methods without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.