Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/23/2024, 1:32:12 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
394d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk @sama @tylercowen how are you defining any intellectual knwoeldge work? I've personally seen a good chunk of tasks automated from end to end.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
394d
Is anyone well-known and not anonymous willing to put money against this prediction?

@elonmusk? @sama? @tylercowen?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
394d
@iruletheworldmo When o3 is fully vetted by the community it will be clear that it is far from capable of completing “any intellectually knowledge sector work.”

(And also ridiculously expensive and damaging to the environment.)

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the capabilities of AI, specifically regarding its ability to perform intellectual knowledge work. It critiques a previous statement for implying that AI can perform 'any' such work, suggesting a misinterpretation or overstatement of AI's capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a clarification in a technical debate.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying a potential overstatement about AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]