The statement appears to be a commentary on a conversation involving public figures, possibly related to a debate or discussion on a public issue. It suggests that a bot is making more sense than most people involved in the conversation, which could imply a critique of the quality of discourse or arguments presented by others.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm anyone, but it could be seen as dismissive or belittling towards the people it refers to, which might indirectly cause harm.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a general negative comparison without specific feedback or engagement, which could be seen as a form of personal attack.
[-2]