Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/23/2024, 3:21:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Jack Dawkins
@ArtfulDodger183
·
396d
@GaryMarcus Do the people who create IQ tests ever score below average on their own tests or are they all always, literally 100% of the time, above average on their own tests?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
396d
Says more about IQ tests and the perils of benchmarking than actual intelligence.
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
396d
OpenAI models have almost surpassed human IQ

Worried?

» Average human IQ, including PhDs: 85-138
» GPT-4o: 115
» o1 preview and o1: 123-135
» o1 pro (estimated): 139
» o3 and o3 mini: 141-157

The statement engages in a discussion about the qualifications and capabilities of psychometricians, indirectly addressing the broader topic of IQ tests and their implications. It contributes to the public discourse on the validity and reliability of IQ tests as measures of intelligence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the qualifications of psychometricians.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive manner, providing an opinion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]