Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
12/23/2024, 7:31:41 PM
X
In reply to:
AI Alchemist
@aialchemistart
·
396d
@DaveShapi @GaryMarcus is nailing the contrarian-for-contrarian’s-sake brand. By dragging behind AI progress & pointing backward, he’s built a niche that keeps him relevant—even when his takes lack substance. Honestly, it’s a brilliant strategy.
David Shapiro ⏩
@DaveShapi
·
396d
The rise and fall of Gary Marcus
adi
@adonis_singh
·
397d
that’s him. he thinks a train set is the same as test set

The statement critiques the lack of concrete examples in an insult, suggesting a need for substantiated arguments. It engages in a broader discussion about public figures and their strategies, touching on the nature of criticism and debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement encourages more thoughtful discourse by highlighting the need for concrete examples, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects the dignity of others by calling out unsubstantiated insults, promoting a more respectful dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the nature of the argument rather than attacking the individual. [+1]