Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
12/24/2024, 6:55:54 AM
X
In reply to:
The Third Rail
@3rdRailPodcast
·
195d
@marwilliamson Not directly, but any time the left decries the evil corporations (of which I do agree that many corporations are evil but we disagree on the reasons why), it's an indirect cry for government intervention because that's the left's credo. Otherwise why would you be crying out…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
195d
@3rdRailPodcast I didn't suggest a government intervention:)
The Third Rail
@3rdRailPodcast
·
195d
@marwilliamson Because so long as the board of directors decides it doesn't go against their fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders then they're allowed to do as they please. Government has no business telling business how to run. Starbucks employees get payed pretty well for a no skill…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
195d
How anyone thinks this can go on is beyond me. You don't even have to read about the French Revolution. Just read Yurtle the Turtle and it's all there.
Warren Gunnels
@GunnelsWarren
·
196d
Still can't stop thinking about how Starbucks could sign a contract to give one greedy CEO a $113 million pay package and a private jet and handout over $70 million in golden parachutes to two CEO who failed, but can't sign a fair contract with nearly 12,000 of its union workers.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on corporate responsibility and government intervention, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is reflective and aims to clarify the speaker's focus on social conscience rather than government action.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is a clarification of intent, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the speaker's focus on social conscience, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a misunderstanding without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]