Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the financial and strategic decisions of AI companies, particularly OpenAI, in the context of AI development and reinforcement learning through human feedback (RLHF). It critiques the current practices in AI development, drawing parallels with past approaches, and highlights the economic implications of these practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but critiques industry practices, which is a neutral stance in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on industry practices rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage critical thinking about industry practices.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI industry practices without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to highlight important industry trends, contributing to societal awareness. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly critique industry practices. [+1]