In reply to:
Sally Plains
@Dearly_debarded
·
196d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
196d
The statement is part of a conversation that touches on political commentary and humor, which can be considered public discourse. The original conversation involves a critique of political parties and public figures, suggesting a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the conversation it is part of includes a critique that could be seen as dismissive or trivializing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement itself is not disrespectful, but the conversation it is part of could be interpreted as dismissive of certain political figures. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on humor and critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but the conversation it is part of includes a critique that could be seen as dismissive.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is part of a public discourse and uses the platform to engage in political commentary, though it does not deeply explore the issues.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.