In reply to:
Sharri Markson
@SharriMarkson
·
267d
The statement is a supportive reply to a tweet discussing a significant public issue: the origins of Covid-19 and the alleged censorship in a government probe. The original tweet by Sharri Markson addresses a public concern about transparency and scientific input in governmental investigations, which constitutes public discourse. The reply, however, does not engage substantively with the issue but rather expresses approval and support for the original tweet.
- The reply does not cause harm but does not actively strive to prevent harm either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The reply respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in any form of harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The reply does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it lacks substantive engagement with the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The reply does not use influence for societal betterment as it lacks substantive contribution to the discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The reply upholds free speech but does not use the platform to engage responsibly with the issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.