In reply to:
Darren J. Beattie 🌐
@DarrenJBeattie
·
78d
Nicole Shanahan
@NicoleShanahan
·
78d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the H-1B visa system, a significant public policy issue related to immigration and labor markets. The tone is assertive and suggests a reform to the current system, advocating for a merit-based entry and simplification of the process.
- The statement does not use harmful language and proposes a constructive change, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a reform that could benefit both immigrants and the host country, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current H-1B system without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for societal betterment by proposing a more efficient and fair immigration system, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public policy issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.