Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses a public concern regarding the investigation into an individual's death, suggesting discrepancies between official reports and private findings. It implies potential misconduct or oversight by authorities, which could be of public interest.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies potential wrongdoing by authorities, which could indirectly cause harm if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent but reveals sensitive details about the deceased's situation, which could be seen as intrusive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the situation by sharing additional findings, but it lacks empathy and compassion in its delivery.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but suggests criticism of the police's findings, which could be seen as constructive if further evidence is provided. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight potential issues in the investigation, which could contribute to societal betterment if it leads to truth and justice. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning official narratives but must ensure responsibility and integrity by providing evidence for its claims. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.