In reply to:
Jacob Aron
@jjaron
ยท
393d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the future of AI, involving a bet between notable figures in the AI field. It references a Substack essay discussing the criteria for evaluating AI progress by 2027, indicating engagement with public issues related to AI development and policy.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions, adhering to the principle of doing no harm.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing a detailed essay on AI, encouraging informed discussion.ย [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about AI's future, without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing AI's future and its implications, the statement uses influence to contribute to societal betterment.ย [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly engaging in a public debate about AI.ย [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.