Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/30/2024, 10:53:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
393d
@GaryMarcus Not sure what your reliability standard is, though…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
394d
@emollick 2: *reliably*? Where?
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
·
394d
Nice to see concrete terms for a bet between an AI skeptic and someone more optimistic about rapid AI ability gain. Much better to have a bet than vague arguments.

A few of these are very hard challenges, though point 2 is already something demonstrated in the literature.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
394d
𝗔 𝗯𝗲𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗔𝗜 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟳: @Miles_Brundage, formerly of OpenAI, bravely takes a version of the bet I offered @Elonmusk! Proceeds to charity.

Can AI do 8 of these 10 by the end of 2027?

1. Watch a previously unseen mainstream…

The statement is part of a public discourse on the capabilities and future potential of AI, specifically in the context of summarization and understanding of media content. It engages in a debate about AI's ability to perform complex tasks reliably, which is a significant topic in technology and ethics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive debate about AI capabilities. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue, focusing on the reliability of AI without personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The discussion uses influence to explore the implications of AI advancements, contributing to societal understanding. [+1]