Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47

Score 83

@boazbaraktcs @Miles_Brundage Correct. That said, at least three people read us wrongly, overinterpreting my views; clearly, in hindsight, we should have been clearer.

Thanks for propagating this correct clarification.

12/31/2024, 1:37:33 PM

In reply to:

Boaz Barak

@boazbaraktcs

394d

@Miles_Brundage and @GaryMarcus corrected me that the odds of the net correspond to @Miles_Brundage ‘s beliefs and not to Gary’s

Boaz Barak

@boazbaraktcs

394d

This is what passes for AI skepticism in 2024: bet against AI doing one of Pulitzer / Oscar / Nobel quality work by 2027, and do this at 1:10 odds.

The statement is part of a public discourse on the future capabilities of AI, specifically regarding a bet on AI's potential achievements by 2027. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a misunderstanding about whose beliefs the odds of the bet represent. The intent is to ensure accurate representation of views in the ongoing discussion.

Principle 5:
I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
The statement acknowledges a mistake in communication and expresses a commitment to clarity, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+2]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement uses the platform to responsibly clarify a public misunderstanding, which aligns with the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]