Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/31/2024, 1:57:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Bogdan Ionut Cirstea
@BogdanIonutCir2
·
394d
@littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage
Linch
@LinchZhang
·
395d
It's subtle, but one might notice a teeny bit of inflation for what counts as "human level."
Bogdan Ionut Cirstea
@BogdanIonutCir2
·
394d
@littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage also, I think associating the conditions of the bet with 'human-level' seems at least a tiny bit misleading; at least 2 or 3 of those seem something like <=0.01% of top human range, so 'human-level', while technically true, is pushing it a bit
Bogdan Ionut Cirstea
@BogdanIonutCir2
·
394d
@littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage Gary somewhat more likely because end of 2027; Miles if it had been by end of 2030 and especially by end of 2035
sarah
@littIeramblings
·
394d
who will win the @GaryMarcus vs @Miles_Brundage bet

The statement is part of a discussion on the capabilities of AI and what constitutes 'human-level' performance. It critiques the criteria used in a bet about AI's future capabilities, suggesting that some tasks are not representative of typical human abilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a constructive critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning the criteria used in the bet, encouraging a deeper discussion on AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]