Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
263d
The statement involves a report on a whistleblower's claims about a serious issue involving national security and potential cover-up, which constitutes public discourse as it addresses public concerns about government transparency and safety.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises awareness of potential harm caused by directed energy weapons.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not revealing personal details of the whistleblower, but the tone could incite fear or panic. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of a serious issue but does so in a sensational manner that may not foster empathy or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents a one-sided view without inviting dialogue or criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a potentially significant issue, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a whistleblower's claims, but the sensational tone may not reflect responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.