Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
12/31/2024, 3:56:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Ludwig Bald
@LudwigBald
·
395d
@ciphergoth @littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage Ah damn. you're right, I did get that mixed up! I was careful not to make a mistake for like 90% of my thought process. I guess that's what I get for not using AI to write my tweets!
Paul Crowley
@ciphergoth
·
395d
@LudwigBald @littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage No, it's 10:1 the other way.
Ludwig Bald
@LudwigBald
·
395d
@littIeramblings @GaryMarcus @Miles_Brundage Because it's a 10:1 bet, they agree that AI will probably not meet the criteria. They agreed on a ~90% implied probability of Gary winning.
sarah
@littIeramblings
·
395d
who will win the @GaryMarcus vs @Miles_Brundage bet

The statement is part of a public discourse on the capabilities of AI and involves a bet on AI's future performance. The tone is light-hearted and involves a friendly wager, reflecting differing opinions on AI's progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is part of a friendly discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the speaker's position on the bet. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]