Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
12/31/2024, 11:34:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
396d
@iruletheworldmo @GaryMarcus Roflmfao, that's a comment on a post regarding Stable Diffusion. If you're going to try and zing someone, learn to read, and also don't quote Nell who's aggressively wrong most of the time.
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
396d
@GaryMarcus oh Gary. stick to your expertise sir. it's not llms.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
396d
And to think that a Nobel Prize winner told me Generative AI systems don’t memorize, because “they just store weights” 🤦‍♂️
Ed Newton-Rex
@ednewtonrex
·
396d
Generative AI models memorize their training data, exhibit 31692

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of copyright and plagiarism in generative AI, specifically referencing a paper on the topic. It critiques the lack of progress in addressing these concerns, which are significant in the context of AI ethics and intellectual property rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight an important issue in AI, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness of potential ethical concerns. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment, but the broader conversation includes dismissive language, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By linking to a paper, the statement promotes understanding and encourages further reading on the topic. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement itself does not engage in personal attacks, but the surrounding conversation includes dismissive and sarcastic remarks, which detract from constructive dialogue. [-1]