In reply to:
Ian Atkinson
@im_atkinson
ยท
397d
The statement is part of a conversation about the potential impact of AI on the workforce, which is a public issue. The tone is speculative and contributes to a broader discussion on AI's societal implications.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral agreement with a previous point, adhering to the principle.ย [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from it either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle.ย [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.