In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
325d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
325d
Han Xiao
@hxiao
·
325d
The statement 'hardly robust, eg' is a brief critique of the AI's performance in generating images that accurately represent the individual in question. It suggests that the AI's output is not reliable or consistent.
- The statement does not cause harm but points out a flaw in the AI's functionality. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The critique is directed at the AI's performance, not at individuals, and does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.