Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -89
1/2/2025, 10:56:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
258d
For over 4 years, the FBI said the threat of terrorism from white supremacists exceeded that from radicalized Muslims. But the data never supported the claim. And now, the New Year's terrorist attack gives ammunition to the push for sweeping reform of our politically corrupt FBI.

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of domestic terrorism and the perceived politicization of the FBI. The tone is accusatory, suggesting that Democrats have manipulated the FBI to misrepresent the threat levels of different extremist groups. The data presented aims to support this claim, but the interpretation may be contentious.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading a narrative that may not be fully supported by evidence, thus influencing public perception negatively. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, particularly by using images of specific people in a potentially defamatory context. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes broad accusations without acknowledging the complexity of the issue. [-2]