In reply to:
The statement involves a discussion about racism and mortgage banking, specifically addressing the issue of redlining, which is a public concern. The tone suggests a lack of clarity or knowledge about current laws related to discrimination in mortgage banking.
- The statement does not appear to intentionally cause harm, but the lack of clarity could contribute to misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks accurate information about the current legal status of redlining. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but fails to provide constructive dialogue due to the uncertainty expressed.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it leaves the legal status of redlining ambiguous. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly, as it spreads uncertainty about an important public issue. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.