Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47

Score 65

What an ignorant and needlessly aggressive tweet.

Daft Punk *paid* for the sample.

But more than that: wanting AI to be just and equitable isn’t “hating” AI; it’s a loving a world in which art and humans can flourish.

Linus Ekenstam

@LinusEkenstam

325d

AI haters will always hate.

Here is daft punk “stealing” 25 years ago.

1/3/2025, 3:50:47 PM

The statement engages in a public discourse about the ethical use of AI in art, addressing misconceptions about AI and intellectual property rights. It aims to clarify misunderstandings and promote a vision of AI that supports human creativity.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses the term 'ignorant and needlessly aggressive' which could be seen as harmful or dismissive, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that advocating for just and equitable AI is not equivalent to hating AI, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the misconception without resorting to personal attacks, although the initial language could be softened for better adherence.