The statement involves a journalist questioning a public figure about comments connecting a terror attack to border policies, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement itself does not appear to cause harm, as it is a question seeking clarification.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public comments by public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The question aims to promote understanding by seeking clarification on potentially misleading statements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the timing and appropriateness of the comments, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.