Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a public figure, Senator Amy Klobuchar, addressing a public issue related to the confirmation of national security picks, which is a matter of public concern and debate. The statement reflects a stance on the process of advising and consenting to presidential appointments, which is a substantive engagement with civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It presents a reasoned argument against rushing confirmations, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pushing back on calls for quick confirmations, emphasizing the duty to advise and consent. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a debate on a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.