Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 29

The statement uses hyperbolic language to critique or satirize the pursuit of funding and hype in tech industries, contrasting it with a more serious discussion about AGI and superintelligence. It seems to mock the commercialization and sensationalism often associated with tech advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses humor and satire, which could be seen as harmless, but it might also trivialize serious discussions about technology and ethics. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful to those genuinely working on AGI.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The satirical tone does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on mocking rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses sarcasm rather than offering substantive critique. [-1]