In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
319d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the performance of large language models (LLMs) on mathematical reasoning tasks, specifically addressing the issue of distribution shift. It references a recent paper and provides a link to further information, contributing to the ongoing debate about the capabilities and limitations of AI models.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on presenting factual information about the performance of LLMs. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing insights into the limitations of LLMs, which can foster a more informed discussion about AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing a paper and providing evidence to support its claims, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly sharing information and contributing to the discourse on AI and its challenges. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.