Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 107
1/6/2025, 1:26:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
200d
@GaryMarcus @sisboombahbah The rules of society change when people can live for hundreds of years, and 99% of jobs are performed by AI and robots. Many things don’t make sense now because few people can envision the future. But let me ask o1-pro about this :)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
201d
@DeryaTR_ @sisboombahbah Because rich people will then give up their power and beachfront properties?

What you said just doesn’t make sense to me.
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
201d
@sisboombahbah @GaryMarcus I highly doubt capitalism will end in a decade, likely will last beyond a few more decades. However, once we solve aging, money will become meaningless.
C B Miller
@sisboombahbah
·
201d
@DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus I thought we’re ending capitalism by the end of the decade? No?
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
201d
@sisboombahbah @GaryMarcus Inflation adjusted to 2025 $
C B Miller
@sisboombahbah
·
201d
@DeryaTR_ @GaryMarcus 10k won’t be worth Jack in 2045.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about societal changes, wealth distribution, and the future of capitalism, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is inquisitive and seeks clarification on a point made about the behavior of wealthy individuals in a future scenario of abundance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral inquiry, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for clarification, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning a point without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]