Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 71
1/6/2025, 1:57:41 PM
X
In reply to:
Jake Sanders
@POSMarketer
·
196d
@GaryMarcus A great list! For me, it's all the latest biology that's coming out on intelligence in humans that feels like another significant barrier - https://www.frontiersin.org/jour… - haven't heard anyone updating their models/thinking on AGI with this info, or even mention it as a concern 🤷‍♂️
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
196d
An MIT professor just asked me, how can you be so confident that OpenAI isn’t very close to AGI?

Here is a thread of links to a several recent observations that I think show how far we are from robust intelligence.

Importantly, all of them are *known* problems, many that I…

The statement by @POSMarketer critiques the title of an article linked in a discussion about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its relation to recent biological findings. The tone is neutral and analytical, aiming to clarify the accuracy of the content despite a potentially misleading title.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on the accuracy of the content rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between the title and the content, encouraging a deeper look into the material. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content's accuracy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]