Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -89
In reply to:

The statement critiques a proposed hate speech law by Trudeau's government, arguing it is unnecessary and could lead to severe penalties for speech-related offenses. It suggests the law is a misuse of power, framing it as a threat to free speech and civil liberties.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by suggesting the law is unnecessary and could unjustly imprison individuals, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the privacy and dignity of the government by accusing it of overreach and misuse of power, but does not engage in hate speech or harassment.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of Trudeau's policies, but it could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses its platform to raise awareness about potential government overreach, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]