Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/6/2025, 5:20:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Matthew Kolakowski
@MatthewKolakow9
·
189d
@GaryMarcus I generated a similar image. I wonder how sanity and visual accuracy checks could be done post hoc? You could have a visual scan and comparison, but I wonder if that meets any kind of rigor or fact check criteria.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
189d
“Please generate a picture of a child riding a flying unicorn through a rainbow” - my kids, who note two tails, two horns, and one very weird looking rainbow.

[The point here is not that the correct output could not be generated, but rather that the system fails to sanity check…

The statement is a lighthearted comment on the image generation capabilities of AI, specifically regarding the visual accuracy of generated images. It humorously notes the presence of a horn on the child, which is a playful observation rather than a serious critique.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is intended as a humorous observation. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a lighthearted understanding of AI's current limitations in image generation. [+1]