In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
254d
The statement critiques the FBI's investigation, suggesting a lack of transparency and potential politicization. It calls for radical transparency from the Trump administration to restore public trust, indicating a concern for governmental accountability.
- The statement aims to address perceived harm caused by lack of transparency, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for openness. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By calling for transparency, the statement promotes understanding and accountability, aligning with the principle of fostering empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the FBI and government practices, avoiding personal attacks, thus adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The call for transparency suggests a use of influence to improve societal trust in government institutions, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.