Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/6/2025, 8:36:06 PM
X
In reply to:
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
187d
@GaryMarcus Yes, but the tense is wrong. They “will say?” Sadly, they are saying it now. All is forgiven if we’re in a war with China for AI primacy. 🤬

But meanwhile…
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
817d
China’s draft AI regulation: “providers of generative AI must ensure data used for training & optimization is obtained through legal means, & such data must…not contain content that infringes intellectual property.”

While I may disagree with other provisions, China gets this 🎯
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
187d
The countdown until we are told that LLMs are “too big to fail” starts now.

“We can’t afford to lose to China”, they will say, accepting their multibillion dollar bailouts.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential geopolitical implications of AI development and regulation, particularly in relation to China and the U.S. It speculates on the strategic use of AI advancements and bailouts, reflecting concerns about international competition and policy responses.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm but implies a critical view of potential policy decisions, which could influence public perception.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It raises awareness of geopolitical issues, potentially fostering understanding of international AI dynamics. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique of anticipated policy actions, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]