Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
1/7/2025, 1:04:03 PM
X
In reply to:
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo
·
182d
@GaryMarcus comparing roombas to agi progress is like comparing a horse-drawn cart to the wright brothers. boston dynamics robots do backflips, tesla bots lift boxes, figure robots open doors. physical ai evolves differently than language models. narrow wins precede broad ones
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
182d
23 years later, Roomba is still here, and not one significantly more capable home robot has been introduced. You can’t buy a functioning bot like Rosie the Robot at any price.

For all of the constant hype about AI, and the huge advance in the amount of data available, not to…

The statement engages in a discussion about the current state and limitations of AI and robotics, particularly in the context of home applications. It critiques the progress in AI software as a limiting factor despite advancements in hardware, contributing to a broader conversation about AI development.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a technical critique, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by explaining the limitations of AI in home robotics, fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the technical aspects of AI and robotics without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement responsibly uses the platform to discuss AI and robotics, contributing to public discourse on technological progress. [+1]