In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing concerns about AI, specifically LLMs and their corporate ownership, in response to a critique about focusing on negative events. The tone is reflective and aims to clarify the speaker's stance on AI.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead clarifies a position on AI, showing a balanced view. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the speaker's nuanced view on AI, distinguishing between general AI and LLMs. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively with criticism by addressing the concern raised without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.