Gary Marcus

The statement engages with a public issue by questioning the circumstances surrounding the death of a whistleblower involved in the development of generative AI, suggesting a need for further investigation. This contributes to the civic dialogue on the human cost of technological advancements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for further investigation, which could be seen as a call for justice.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the deceased by not making unfounded accusations but rather expressing doubt and a desire for clarity.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement indirectly promotes empathy by highlighting the potential human cost of technological development. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather questions the official narrative, which is a form of constructive criticism. [+1]