Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/8/2025, 6:55:02 PM
X
In reply to:
jam dinding mati
@patternxde
·
31d
@GaryMarcus He stole your whole idea after years downgrading your credibility lol
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
31d
Lol. When your opponent starts to sound like you, you know you have won.
Peter Kuhar
@pkuhar
·
31d
Listening to @ylecun live at CES. If i was reading the transcription of this he might as well be @GaryMarcus

The statement is part of a conversation that involves public figures and touches on issues of intellectual property and credibility, which can be considered public discourse. The tone is informal and somewhat accusatory, suggesting a dispute over ideas and recognition.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it contributes to a potentially harmful narrative by supporting an accusation without evidence. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the person being accused, as it supports an unverified claim of idea theft, which could be considered a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it supports a personal attack rather than fostering understanding or resolution. [-2]