The statement critiques the media's handling of the Trump-Russia collusion story, suggesting it was a significant error. It implies that certain journalists were more accurate in their reporting. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational.
- The statement challenges the accuracy of media reporting, which could be seen as promoting accountability, but the use of strong language may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does criticize specific media outlets and journalists, which could be seen as undermining their dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of media practices, but the tone is more accusatory than constructive, lacking a focus on dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.