Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47

Score -18

Nothing dishonest about it at all. He’s saying he has no concrete evidence of exfiltration. That’s a serious piece of testimony, leaving the factual record far short of knowing conclusively a) the DNC was hacked and b) by Russia no less.

Scary Shiva Jaamen

@Jaamennn

255d

@HeKS44364823 @mtaibbi @aaronjmate @ggreenwald @paulsperry_ @LeeSmithDC Found it. Very dishonest manipulation of what he actually testified by Taibbi. Shameful.

1/9/2025, 2:17:33 AM

The statement engages in a discussion about the credibility and interpretation of testimony related to the alleged hacking of the DNC and Russian involvement. It questions the evidence and interpretation of events, suggesting a lack of concrete proof. The tone is critical and skeptical, aiming to clarify or challenge existing narratives.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but challenges the interpretation of evidence, which could influence public perception.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in critical dialogue, questioning the interpretation of testimony without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to question and potentially clarify public understanding of a significant issue, aiming for a more accurate narrative. [+1]