In reply to:
Vedant Misra
@vedantmisra
·
33d
Sam Altman
@sama
·
33d
The statement engages in public discourse by questioning the timeline and evidence for claims about AI advancements, specifically superintelligence. It seeks clarification and accountability, promoting a critical examination of bold predictions.
- The statement adheres to the principle of doing no harm by asking for clarification rather than making assumptions or accusations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the vagueness of the original claim and asking for evidence, which encourages a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.