Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/9/2025, 12:31:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Florian S
@airesearch12
路
29d
@GaryMarcus 馃憞
Aidan McLau
@aidan_mclau
路
356d
some days, the lines betwen yann lecun and gary marcus blur
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
30d
Lol. When your opponent starts to sound like you, you know you have won.
Peter Kuhar
@pkuhar
路
30d
Listening to @ylecun live at CES. If i was reading the transcription of this he might as well be @GaryMarcus

The statement by @airesearch12 engages in a public discourse about the ongoing debate between prominent figures in AI, specifically Yann LeCun and Gary Marcus. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical, particularly towards Aidan McLau's comments, suggesting they are poorly considered. The intent seems to be to express disagreement with certain viewpoints in the AI community.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the dismissive tone could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others by dismissing their views as poorly considered.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive feedback.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive elements and could be seen as a personal attack on Aidan McLau's views.聽[-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is primarily a critique of others' statements.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it focuses on personal disagreements rather than broader societal issues.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not violate free speech principles, but it could use the platform more responsibly by fostering constructive dialogue.