Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a meeting where former President Trump and Stephen Miller discussed plans for executive orders related to immigration policies, including Title 42, local law enforcement assisting ICE, and the border wall. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses significant public policy issues and potential governmental actions.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm but reports on potential policies that could be harmful, depending on their implementation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, though the policies discussed may have implications for these principles.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward report of potential policy actions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to inform the public about potential policy changes, contributing to civic awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on public policy discussions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.