Rashida Tlaib

The statement is a critical commentary on the priorities of a new Congress, suggesting that instead of addressing pressing domestic issues like lowering costs or the housing crisis, they are focusing on sanctioning the International Criminal Court to protect a political figure, which the statement accuses of committing genocide. The tone is accusatory and provocative, aiming to highlight perceived misaligned priorities and criticize political actions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, particularly the use of 'genocidal maniac' and 'genocide,' which are inflammatory and could incite strong reactions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory language towards a public figure, which could be seen as a form of hate speech. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach to the issues it raises. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against a political figure. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement attempts to use influence to draw attention to what it perceives as a misalignment of priorities, but does so in a divisive manner. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory language. [-1]