Small Gov Lizard
@smallgovlizard
·
255d
The statement critiques a public figure's interpretation of 'disinformation' and references a dismissed lawsuit, suggesting skepticism about her claims. It engages in public discourse by discussing media accountability and the role of government in managing disinformation.
- The statement implies criticism but does not directly harm; however, it questions the credibility of a public figure.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the individual involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical and somewhat sarcastic, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.