Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -18
Scary Shiva Jaamen
@Jaamennn
·
255d
@mtaibbi It's dishonest to take "no evidence of" from referring to the actual process of exfiltration and attached it to "hacking" since they had ample evidence of hacking, down to the details of preparing the files for exfiltration, just no evidence of the actual exfiltration
1/9/2025, 8:30:15 PM
X

The conversation involves a debate over the interpretation of evidence related to alleged hacking and data exfiltration from the DNC, touching on issues of media representation and public testimony. The tone is contentious, with accusations of dishonesty and manipulation of testimony.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and replies involve accusations of dishonesty, which could potentially harm reputations if unfounded. However, they are part of a broader debate on evidence interpretation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects privacy but involves public figures and testimony, focusing on the accuracy of public statements rather than personal attacks.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is critical and involves accusations, which could be seen as personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, though it is part of a public debate. [-1]