The statement addresses a significant public issue concerning the sanctioning of the International Criminal Court (ICC) by the House. It expresses a clear opinion on the matter, highlighting the importance of human rights lawyers and the need to hold war criminals accountable, regardless of their alliances. The statement criticizes the decision to sanction the ICC and supports the work of those documenting atrocities.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the protection and celebration of human rights lawyers. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the efforts of those documenting atrocities and calling for their celebration. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the House's decision without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by supporting accountability for war crimes. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.