In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
36d
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the presence of unidentified drones over sensitive sites and the alleged misinformation by government agencies. It engages in public discourse by discussing government transparency and accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights potential governmental oversight issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse government agencies of lying, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it accuses agencies of lying without providing evidence or inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by addressing government actions, but it should ensure responsible use by providing evidence for its claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.