Peter Diamandis

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 137

The statement critiques the insurance industry by highlighting its reactive nature, suggesting that insurance should be more preventative. It raises a public issue regarding the structure and function of insurance policies, which is a substantive engagement with a societal concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it critiques an industry, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a discussion on how insurance could be more preventative, fostering a dialogue on potential improvements. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the insurance industry without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By questioning the current insurance model, the statement uses influence to potentially advocate for societal betterment through improved insurance practices. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing an industry and contributing to public dialogue. [+1]